Z I M | January 2008 |
Short Info: PMC (USA) |
Wolfram Fischer
Zentrum für Informatik und wirtschaftliche Medizin
CH-9116 Wolfertswil SG
(Switzerland)
http://www.fischer-zim.ch/
Kapitel
G.2 aus:
The DRG Family
State of affairs: 2007
|
|
|
|
G.2 |
PMC – Patient Management Categories |
1 |
|||
Table 1: |
2 | ||||
Source: Fischer [DRGs im Vergleich, 1999]: 47. |
|||||
|
One or more than one PMC per case |
The PMC system1 is an American competition model to the DRG systems, developed during the 80s. This system assigns not just one, but several disease categories to any individual hospital stay, if necessary. All diagnoses are considered without any ranking (unlike in most DRG systems where only the first, so-called "principal diagnosis", is relevant). |
3 | ||
54 disease/disorder modules |
However, since not each diagnosis describes a unique clinical condition, 54 disease/disorder modules have been defined (e. g. appendicitis, vascular disorder, delivery, lung neoplasm etc.). From each selected module, the PMC best reflecting the severity of the respective disease is assigned to the hospital stay. |
4 | |||
|
|||||
2 For example, the PMCs for acute myocardial infarction with increasing severity are: uncomplicated, with tachyrhythmia, with bardyrhythmia/heart block, with hypertension with congestive heart failure with operation, with congestive heart failure without operation, with cardiogenic shock, with cardiac catheterization/PTCA. |
Severity concepts |
This approach allows for the following severity concepts to be considered:
|
5 | ||
Calculation of cost weights by means of patient management paths |
Assignment of several patient categories to a single hospital stay implies some difficulties as well: Since a patient presenting two diseases is admitted only once, reference costs (or cost weights, respectively) from the individual patient categories cannot be simply added to obtain a total cost weight for the said hospital stay. |
6 | |||
The PMC's solution to this problem is as follows: For each PMC, a typical patient management path was elaborated. For each step in treatment contained in this pathway, individual cost weights are calculated. When more than one PMC is eligible for the same hospital stay, the total cost weight is computed aligning all corresponding patient management paths and taking from these the highest given cost weight for each treatment step. |
7 | ||||
|
|||||
|
References |
||||
Fischer W. Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) im Vergleich zu den Patientenklassifikationssystemen von Deutschland und Österreich. Eine problemzentrierte Diskussion von Patientenklassifikationssystemen für stationäre Akutbehandlungen im Hinblick auf deren Verwendung in Vergütungssystemen. Wolfertswil (ZIM) 1999: 155 pp. Auszüge: http:// www.fischer-zim.ch / studien / DRGs-im-Vergleich-9901-Info.htm. | 8 | ||||
PRI (The Pittsburgh Research Institute). Patient Management Categories. A Comprehensive Overview. Pittsburgh (The Pittsburgh Research Institute) 1993: approx. 65 pp. | 9 |
Z I M
-
Zentrum für Informatik und wirtschaftliche Medizin
|
Previous Chapter: | Tables of Contents: | Next Chapter: |
Short Info: Disease Staging (USA) | DRG Family | Short Info: »mipp› (Switzerland) |
Navigations-Tabellen | ||
Z I M - Hauptseite |
© Z I M
Source =
http://www.fischer-zim.ch/textk-pcs-en/t-G2-drg-fam-PMC-en-0801.htm
( latest compilation:
17.04.2012
)