Fischer: Short Info: CMG (Canada).

Z I M       January 2008


Short Info: CMG (Canada)

Wolfram Fischer

Zentrum für Informatik und wirtschaftliche Medizin
CH-9116 Wolfertswil SG (Switzerland)
http://www.fischer-zim.ch/


Kapitel D.2 aus:
The DRG Family
State of affairs: 2007

      
Navigation
 î  ZIM home
 î  navigation tables
 î  sitemap
 î  abbreviations
DRG Family
^ index
<   Short Info: HRG (UK)
>   Short Info: LDF (Austria)
 
=   [print] [pdf icon] Whole Text as pdf file (1020 KB)
Related Links
»    CMG (Kanada)
»    Kurz-Info: CMG (Kanada)
External Links
»   Case Mix Groups
 
 

|^·<×>·v|

D.2

 

CMG – Case Mix Groups (Canada)

1

1 Cf. CIHI [Grouping Methodologies, 2004]: 5 f.

 

HCFA-DRG descendant

In Canada, a first CMG system was introduced as early as 1983. It was inspired by the HCFA-DRG system.1

2

 

Own terms

There are some peculiarities concerning terminology here. Instead of "Major Diagnostic Categories" (MDCs), "Major Clinical Categories" (MCCs) were used. And instead of the principal diagnosis, the CMG-grouping used the "Most Responsible Diagnosis" (MRDx) as its starting point. (The concept points out the "most important" diagnosis, that is, the one with greatest influence on the length of stay.)

3

2 Benoit et al. [CMG/CW-Calc, 2000].

 

CMG/Plx

In 1997, the system was restructured. All age and CC-splits were eliminated. Instead, four "Complexity Levels" and three age levels were defined. The revised system was then renamed "Case Mix Groups with Complexity Overlay and Age Adjustement" (CMG/Plx). It carried 477 CMGs, encompassing 3413 refined "APLX groups".2

4

3 Cf. CIHI [CMG+ Tool Kit, 2007].

 

CMG+

In 2007, a further fundamental recast followed.3 The number of main categories was reduced from 25 to 21. CC lists were defined for each main category. A total of 558 base CMGs were defined.

5

 

Five potential split variables

The base CMGs could now be split, according to needs, by using up to five pre-defined "factors":

  • Age categories (9 levels).
  • Co-morbidity driven severity categories (5 levels).
  • Flagged interventions (lists for 14 categories of interventional procedures).
  • Number of interventions (3 categories).
  • Interventions carried out outside the hospital (list).

6

   

 

 

 

References

 
 
Benoit et al.
CMG/CW-Calc
2000
Benoit D, Skea W, Mitchell S. Developing Cost Weights with Limited Cost Data. Experiences Using Canadian Cost Data. In: Casemix Quarterly, Padova 2000(2)3: 89–97.

7

 
CIHI
Grouping Methodologies
2004
Canadian Institute for Health Information. Acute Care Grouping Methodologies: From Diagnosis Related Groups to Case Mix Groups Redevelopment. Background Paper for the Redevelopment of the Acute Care Inpatient Grouping Methodology Using ICD-10-CA/CCI Classification Systems. Ottawa 2004: 16 pp. Internet: http:// secure.cihi.ca / cihiweb / en / downloads / Acute_Care_Grouping_Methodologies2004_e.pdf.

8

 
CIHI
CMG+ Tool Kit
2007
Canadian Institute for Health Information. CMG+ Tool Kit. Transitioning to the new CMG+ Grouping Methodology (and associated Health Resource Indicators), Fiscal 2007-2008. Ottawa 2007: 40 pp. Internet: http:// secure.cihi.ca / cihiweb / en / downloads / implementation _ toolkit _ mar8 _%2007 _ e.doc.

9

Z I M  -  Zentrum für Informatik und wirtschaftliche Medizin
CH-9116 Wolfertswil (SG), Steigstrasse 12, Switzerland
E-mail: , Tel: +41 71 3900 444

 
 
Previous Chapter: Tables of Contents: Next Chapter:
Short Info: HRG (UK) DRG Family Short Info: LDF (Austria)
Navigations-Tabellen
Z I M - Hauptseite

©  Z I M 
Source = http://www.fischer-zim.ch/textk-pcs-en/t-D2-drg-fam-CMG-en-0801.htm
( latest compilation: 17.04.2012 )